Post Concilium, Ergo propter Concilium

It seems like there’s a tendency to impute everything that’s been allowed or changed in the last forty years to the Second Vatican Council. While there may certainly be a remote causal relationship and while later generations may compress the timeline somewhat in speaking of history, it seems to me to be largely inaccurate to speak this way.

Here are some examples I’ve heard fairly commonly:

Myth: Vatican II allowed female altar servers.
Fact: This was allowed in 1994 through an interpretation of Canon Law.

Myth: Vatican II abrogated the requirement for women to wear veils in church.
Fact: That requirement was abrogated with the promulgation of the 1983 Code of Canon Law.

It seems that we forget just how recent some of these things are, even compared with how recent the Council was.

Note: Both of these examples involve women because of the context in which they came up, in case you were curious.

One Response to “Post Concilium, Ergo propter Concilium”

Gravatar Mom

Do you know why the requirement for women to wear veils in church was abrogated? I just know that I never did, but I have read that passage about the requirement in the Bible.

Gravatar Dylan

I don’t know why it was abrogated per se, but even though it’s mentioned in the Bible it is a disciplinary matter over which the Church has authority. Inter Insigniores even uses it as an example of something in St. Paul’s writing that is no longer normative.

Leave a Reply

Creative Commons License
By submitting a comment, you agree to place it under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

Powered by WP Hashcash